LA Mediators

Mediators of Southern California

Leslie (Les) S. Rothenberg
  • Male
  • Pacific Palisades, CA
  • United States
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Share
  • Blog Posts (66)
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Leslie (Les) S. Rothenberg's Friends

  • Scott Berman
 

Leslie (Les) S. Rothenberg's Page

Profile Information

What is your area of practice?
Mediation/Arbitration
What is your address and phone number?
16751 Edgar Street, Pacific Palisades, CA 90272-3226, 310-454-9933

Leslie (Les) S. Rothenberg's Blog

New Appellate Arbitration Opinion

The trial court, rather than an arbitrator, should decide the merits of the waiver by litigation conduct defense to arbitration asserted by plaintiffs.

Hong v. CJ CGV America Holdings, Inc., California Court of Appeal, Second District, Div. Five, case no.  B246945, filed December 18, 2013,

Link: http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B246945.PDF

Posted on December 18, 2013 at 7:34pm

New Appellate Arbitration Opinion

A non-appealability clause in an arbitration agreement that eliminates all federal court review of arbitration awards, including review under Sec. 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act, is not enforceable

In re Wal-Mart Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, case no. 11-17718, filed December 17, 2013

Link:…

Continue

Posted on December 17, 2013 at 5:04pm

New Appellate Arbitration Opinion

An insufficiently-identified third-party to an internet contract containing arbitration clause cannot compel purchaser to arbitrate claims in class action against identified contracting party.

Lee v. Intelius Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, case no. 11-35810, filed December 16, 2013

Link: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/12/16/11-35810.pdf

Posted on December 16, 2013 at 4:40pm

New Appellate Arbitration Opinion

Judge, rather than an arbitrator, should decide whether arbitration clause in an attorney retainer agreement was unconscionable, and that clause was unenforceable under non-preempted Washington law

Smith v. JEM Group Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, case no. 11-35964, filed December 12, 2013

Link: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/12/11/11-35964.pdf

Posted on December 12, 2013 at 7:41pm

Comment Wall

You need to be a member of LA Mediators to add comments!

Join LA Mediators

  • No comments yet!
 
 
 

Badge

Loading…

Latest Activity

Birthdays

There are no birthdays today

© 2017   Created by Kym Adams Director of CEDRS.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service